<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Gets Premilinary Support For Extensions/Plugins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/</link>
	<description>Google Chrome Plugins and Themes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:50:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Developing with Chrome Kicks Bottom &#38; Firefox Has Lost It&#8217;s Way - Isogenic Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-12738</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Developing with Chrome Kicks Bottom &#38; Firefox Has Lost It&#8217;s Way - Isogenic Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-12738</guid>
		<description>[...] the web without AdBlock because I *HATE ADVERTS THAT MUCH* so it wasn&#8217;t until Chrome started getting plugin support that I finally decided to check it out. There was this bare-bones browser window with none of my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the web without AdBlock because I *HATE ADVERTS THAT MUCH* so it wasn&#8217;t until Chrome started getting plugin support that I finally decided to check it out. There was this bare-bones browser window with none of my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8588</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome makes my balls wet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome makes my balls wet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » The power of market dominance - browsers</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8550</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » The power of market dominance - browsers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8550</guid>
		<description>[...] once the full range of browser extensions and plugins are available on this platform (which is starting to happen).&#160; I&#8217;ve noticed recently that Google seems to be pushing Chrome harder through [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] once the full range of browser extensions and plugins are available on this platform (which is starting to happen).&nbsp; I&#8217;ve noticed recently that Google seems to be pushing Chrome harder through [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apps for Windows : Chrome 2 &#124; ithinkdifferent</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8488</link>
		<dc:creator>Apps for Windows : Chrome 2 &#124; ithinkdifferent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 05:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8488</guid>
		<description>[...] word on extensions in Chrome 2 so far, but you can get them using some tricks. Chrome 2 is definitely faster, specially with Google services. At the same time, Internet Explorer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] word on extensions in Chrome 2 so far, but you can get them using some tricks. Chrome 2 is definitely faster, specially with Google services. At the same time, Internet Explorer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLC</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8322</link>
		<dc:creator>PLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8322</guid>
		<description>I like Google Chrome Very Much!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Google Chrome Very Much!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrome Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8306</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrome Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8306</guid>
		<description>Guys, give the browser some more time. Its only 6 months since it has been released. Already it has been voted the fastest browser as you know. If you just need something simple then subscribe to the Stable Release of Chrome, as pointed out by onoe guy, all these command lines adds, etc are for only testers and developers to implement those things in the stable release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, give the browser some more time. Its only 6 months since it has been released. Already it has been voted the fastest browser as you know. If you just need something simple then subscribe to the Stable Release of Chrome, as pointed out by onoe guy, all these command lines adds, etc are for only testers and developers to implement those things in the stable release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichelD</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8305</link>
		<dc:creator>MichelD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8305</guid>
		<description>abso, didn&#039;t the words &quot;preliminary&quot;, &quot;some sort of extensions support&quot;, &quot;very basic at this stage&quot; and &quot;on the developers website&quot; give you a hint that it&#039;s still preliminary, very basic at this stage and somehow reserved for developers?

I love Chrome, carry on guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abso, didn&#8217;t the words &#8220;preliminary&#8221;, &#8220;some sort of extensions support&#8221;, &#8220;very basic at this stage&#8221; and &#8220;on the developers website&#8221; give you a hint that it&#8217;s still preliminary, very basic at this stage and somehow reserved for developers?</p>
<p>I love Chrome, carry on guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abso</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8303</link>
		<dc:creator>abso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8303</guid>
		<description>Now if they just give you a way to load extensions/themes from within the damn browser itself... Why bother releasing support for this stuff if you have to much around with command line options and dll overwrites to make it happen. This browser is perfect for the build it yourself linux crowd, but is silly for everyone else that just wants something that is simple to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if they just give you a way to load extensions/themes from within the damn browser itself&#8230; Why bother releasing support for this stuff if you have to much around with command line options and dll overwrites to make it happen. This browser is perfect for the build it yourself linux crowd, but is silly for everyone else that just wants something that is simple to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-gets-premilinary-support-for-extensionsplugins/comment-page-1/#comment-8297</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=238#comment-8297</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s GOOD. I like &lt;strong&gt;Google Chrome&lt;/strong&gt;!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s GOOD. I like <strong>Google Chrome</strong>!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

