<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome To Have Extensions/Plugins By May 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/</link>
	<description>Google Chrome Plugins and Themes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:02:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8336</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8336</guid>
		<description>Bruce, it&#039;s nice idea, but can&#039;t happen as Chrome isn&#039;t built for dopes to mess about with. Extensions are fine in theory, but if anything is allowed then the browser becomes messy and unsafe. I&#039;ve used Firefox for a long time, and ended up dumping many of the so-called &#039;cool&#039; extensions because they caused unexpected behaviour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, it&#8217;s nice idea, but can&#8217;t happen as Chrome isn&#8217;t built for dopes to mess about with. Extensions are fine in theory, but if anything is allowed then the browser becomes messy and unsafe. I&#8217;ve used Firefox for a long time, and ended up dumping many of the so-called &#8216;cool&#8217; extensions because they caused unexpected behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8314</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8314</guid>
		<description>Just port all of the firefox extensions to Chrome !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just port all of the firefox extensions to Chrome !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy Solutions (Part 4): Firefox Privacy Features &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8283</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy Solutions (Part 4): Firefox Privacy Features &#124; The Technology Liberation Front</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8283</guid>
		<description>[...] users&#8217; privacy. Google&#8217;s Chrome browser does not currently support third-party add-ons but plans to do so in an upcoming release. Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer does support extensions, and Microsoft has a website devoted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] users&#8217; privacy. Google&#8217;s Chrome browser does not currently support third-party add-ons but plans to do so in an upcoming release. Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer does support extensions, and Microsoft has a website devoted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Update of Google Chrome may add Full screen mode.</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8245</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Update of Google Chrome may add Full screen mode.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8245</guid>
		<description>[...] bit of news, Google Chrome may have exntesions ( plugins ) support by May 2009. I found this news here, read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bit of news, Google Chrome may have exntesions ( plugins ) support by May 2009. I found this news here, read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otto</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8242</link>
		<dc:creator>otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8242</guid>
		<description>Can we have a Leechblock type productivity/ webpage blocker tool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we have a Leechblock type productivity/ webpage blocker tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerberus Starraiser &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Chrome: The Novelty is Wearing Off</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8236</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerberus Starraiser &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Chrome: The Novelty is Wearing Off</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8236</guid>
		<description>[...] net is abound with rumors and such that Chrome is getting extensions eventually.&#160; According to Chromeplugins.org, and confirmed by Google, there seems to be a session dedicated to the development of extensions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] net is abound with rumors and such that Chrome is getting extensions eventually.&#160; According to Chromeplugins.org, and confirmed by Google, there seems to be a session dedicated to the development of extensions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyhook</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8226</link>
		<dc:creator>skyhook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8226</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m anxiously awaiting these plugins. I hope there&#039;s one that shows a preview thumb in google searches of the website, as well as a plugin in the bottom right corner to see alexa and pr ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m anxiously awaiting these plugins. I hope there&#8217;s one that shows a preview thumb in google searches of the website, as well as a plugin in the bottom right corner to see alexa and pr ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome 2.0.160.0 er klar for nedlasting &#124; BLOGG BROMSTAD</title>
		<link>http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/google-chrome-to-have-extensionsplugins-by-may-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-8220</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome 2.0.160.0 er klar for nedlasting &#124; BLOGG BROMSTAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromeplugins.org/?p=225#comment-8220</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Chrome To Have Extensions/Plugins By May 2009 - Chrome Plugins By Chrome Blog All developers and users who have been waiting impatiently for Google Chrome to support extensions a... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Chrome To Have Extensions/Plugins By May 2009 &#8211; Chrome Plugins By Chrome Blog All developers and users who have been waiting impatiently for Google Chrome to support extensions a&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
