Cheers StevePaul, thought I don't know about excellent; bitty, but hopefully helpful.
I used Adsweep for some time, but tired of trying to include my own filters to it, as I didn't grasp how at the time. I went back to Firefox for Adblock Plus, read up on ad blocking, and realised that a proxy filter should do the same job for Chrome. I tried Privoxy, but found it a bit complex and couldn't get my own filters to work. I tried a few others and found BFilter the easiest to use, especially as it doesn't need a whopping great 'Easylist'. I haven't used the Javascript filtering, but there's a mention of it in this thread. Blocking an ad site or stat/counter server lags is done by just adding a simple URL pattern in BFilter > Configuration > Advanced > 'urls.local' tab. (I've attached my list in case it's of use, along with a minimal Adsweep as a starting point).
The reason I use Adsweep is because excellent as Lex1's Adblock+ element hider is, it was loosing my settings all the time. Lex1 said it's a Chrome bug. I thought using the Adsweep script would work well to hide items which I preferred not to see from favourite sites (I'd worked out how to do it by this time), but there was no point in having all of Adsweep's filters when BFilter was properly blocking it all now. In fact, some of the Adsweep lines may be duplicating BFilter, but they're only one-liners, and were left in to remind me how each section works.
Yeah, I'd say this combination is ideal for me. Perhaps BFilter could do the tidying up so that Adsweep isn't needed, but I haven't put time into finding out how to block single elements with BFilter, so hiding them does fine for now. Just had a thought; if just about everyone online all over the world blocked ads all the time, the cynical in-your-face ad spammers would just die out, and the 'nice' ones would have to ask if you'd please click something to look at a couple of ads. Roll on the day that happens..!


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote
