Hello all. I am very impressed on the sandbox/dropped rights technique of chrome/iron.
But a problem with the sandbox is its implementation to plugins such as flash player.
Cause if a website exploits the flash player the sandbox will not work anymore.
And normally the malicious website will exploit plugins and not the browser itself.
So i came across the --save-plugins switch which is awesome if it ist working like it should be.
My question is: Does this switch really put the flash player and every other plugin into the sandbox, means drops the rights of all plugins down?


Second question: What other switches are available for Iron/Chrome?

I am aware of:

--enable-extensions
--safe-plugins
-disable-java
-incognito

http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrom...cc?view=markup

Thank you very much!

What is the difference between switches tarting with one - oder two of them --
?

I think there is no difference when running latest version of dev Chrome

Ah, ok. Thank you!

On Windows you can use - -- or / to prefix a switch. It doesn't matter what you use. On Linux you can only use - or -- and I'm not sure about Mac.
Finally, use a -- after all your switches to tell Chrome all switches have been passed, and that the next argument is a URL to open, if desired. (If you don't want to pass a URL, the final -- isn't necessary.)
For example:

Code:

chrome.exe --disable-javascript /disable-images -incognito -- "http://somenaughtyasciisite.net"

;p